Standard Model parameters from pure geometry — E₈×E₈ on G₂-holonomy manifold K₇, zero adjustable parameters.
| Precision | 0.087% mean deviation across 18 dimensionless predictions |
| Uniqueness | #1 out of 19,100 configurations tested (>4σ significance) |
| Parameters | Zero adjustable (all structurally determined) |
| Verified | 180+ relations proven in Lean 4 + Coq (zero axioms) |
| Exact results | sin²θ_W = 3/13 · τ = 3472/891 · det(g) = 65/32 · Monster = 47×59×71 |
Dimensional reduction: E₈×E₈ (496D) → AdS₄ × K₇ (11D) → Standard Model (4D)
| Paper | Proofs | Video |
|---|---|---|
| Main Paper | Lean 4 + Coq | YouTube (8 min) |
| Document | Description |
|---|---|
| Main Paper | Complete theoretical framework |
| S1: Foundations | E₈, G₂, K₇ mathematical construction |
| S2: Derivations | All 18 dimensionless derivations (0.087% mean) |
| S3: Dynamics | RG flow, torsional dynamics |
| Background | Start Here |
|---|---|
| Geometer | GiftPy for Geometers — G₂ metric construction pipeline |
| Physicist | Info Geo for Physicists — Topological approach to SM parameters |
| Formalization | Lean for Physics — Machine-verified physical relations |
| Philosophy | Philosophy — Foundational perspective |
| Document | Description |
|---|---|
| Speculative Physics | Scale bridge, Yukawa, M-theory, quantum gravity |
| Number-Theoretic Structures | Fibonacci, Prime Atlas, Monster, Moonshine |
| GIFT Atlas | Complete constant/relation database |
| Sector | Predictions | Mean Deviation | Highlight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electroweak | 3 | 0.12% | sin²θ_W = 3/13 |
| Lepton | 3 | 0.04% | Q_Koide = 2/3 (0.0009%) |
| Quark | 1 | 0.00% | m_s/m_d = 20 (exact) |
| Neutrino | 4 | 0.15% | δ_CP = 197° |
| Cosmology | 3 | 0.07% | n_s = ζ(11)/ζ(5) (0.004%) |
| Structural | 4 | exact | N_gen = 3, τ = 3472/891 |
| Relation | Value | Topological Origin |
|---|---|---|
| sin²θ_W | 3/13 | b₂/(b₃ + dim(G₂)) |
| κ_T | 1/61 | 1/(b₃ − dim(G₂) − p₂) |
| τ | 3472/891 | (496 × 21)/(27 × 99) |
| det(g) | 65/32 | Metric determinant from G₂ structure |
| δ_CP | 197° | 7 × dim(G₂) + H* |
| m_s/m_d | 20 | p₂² × Weyl |
| Q_Koide | 2/3 | dim(G₂)/b₂ |
| Monster | 196883 | L₈ × (b₃−18) × (b₃−6) = 47×59×71 |
The G₂ structure admits an exact closed form:
| Property | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Associative 3-form | φ = (65/32)^{1/14} × φ₀ | EXACT |
| Metric | g = (65/32)^{1/7} × I₇ | EXACT |
| Torsion | T = 0 (constant form) | EXACT |
| det(g) | 65/32 | EXACT |
Joyce’s existence theorem is trivially satisfied — no numerical fitting required.
| Structure | Result | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Fibonacci F₃–F₁₂ | Maps to GIFT constants (p₂, N_gen, Weyl, rank, α_B, b₂, …) | ✓ Proven |
| Prime Atlas | 100% coverage of primes < 200 | ✓ Proven |
| Monster dimension | 196883 = 47×59×71, arithmetic progression d=12 | ✓ Proven |
| j-invariant | 744 = 3 × 248 = N_gen × dim(E₈) | ✓ Proven |
| McKay correspondence | Coxeter(E₈) = 30 = icosahedron edges | ✓ Proven |
Comprehensive validation confirms that (b₂=21, b₃=77) is not merely a good choice but the unique optimum among G₂ manifold configurations.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Configurations tested | 19,100 |
| GIFT rank | #1 |
| GIFT mean deviation | 0.23% |
| Second-best deviation | 0.50% |
| Improvement factor | 2.2× |
| Rank | b₂ | b₃ | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | 77 | 0.23% |
| 2 | 21 | 76 | 0.50% |
| 3 | 21 | 78 | 0.50% |
| 4 | 21 | 79 | 0.79% |
| 5 | 21 | 75 | 0.81% |
GIFT occupies a sharp minimum: moving one unit in any direction more than doubles the deviation.
Details: Uniqueness Test Report
| Prediction | Experiment | Timeline | Falsification Criterion |
|---|---|---|---|
| δ_CP = 197° | DUNE | 2027-2030 | Outside [187°, 207°] |
| sin²θ_W = 3/13 | FCC-ee | 2040s | Outside [0.2295, 0.2320] |
| m_s/m_d = 20 | Lattice QCD | 2030 | Converges outside [19, 21] |
| N_gen = 3 | LHC | Ongoing | Fourth generation discovery |
Details: S2 Section 10
The framework contains no continuous adjustable parameters fitted to data. However, it makes discrete structural choices:
These are mathematically motivated but constitute model selection. The framework predicts observables given these choices — it does not explain why nature chose this geometry.
However: Statistical validation shows (b₂=21, b₃=77) is the unique optimum among 19,100 tested configurations. This doesn’t explain the choice, but establishes it is not arbitrary.
The v3.0 structures (Fibonacci, Monster, McKay) have independent mathematical existence:
Their appearance suggests structural rather than coincidental relationships.
| Blueprint | Description |
|---|---|
| GIFT Lean Blueprint | Dependency graph |
| K7 Manifold Blueprint | K₇ construction |
Created with Lean Blueprint Copilot
| Repository | Description |
|---|---|
| gift-framework/core | Formal verification (Lean 4 + Coq), K₇ metric pipeline |
| Platform | |
|---|---|
| YouTube | @giftheory |
| Substack | giftheory.substack.com |
| X | @GIFTheory |
| Archive | |
|---|---|
| Zenodo | 10.5281/zenodo.17979433 |
| ResearchGate | Author page |
@software{gift_framework_v31,
title = {GIFT Framework v3.1: Geometric Information Field Theory},
author = {de La Fournière, Brieuc},
year = {2025},
url = {https://github.com/gift-framework/GIFT},
version = {3.1.1}
}
See CITATION.md for additional formats.
MIT License — see LICENSE
Gift from bit